July 20, 2026
How to Take Notes in Class That You Can Actually Use
Learn practical note taking methods for class: what the longhand versus laptop research shows, the Cornell method, and how to review notes so they stick.

The direct answer: take notes in your own words, not verbatim, and structure them so you can review later. Research favors longhand for understanding, yet the bigger factor is reviewing soon and turning the notes into questions. This guide covers the methods and the review routine that makes class notes worth keeping.
Note Taking at a Glance
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Laptop or pen? | A 2014 study found longhand beat laptop for conceptual learning because it avoids verbatim copying. |
| Best format? | Cornell, outline, or concept style, depending on the subject. |
| What ruins notes? | Transcribing the lecture word for word. |
| How to make them useful? | Review within a day and turn them into questions. |
| What makes them stick? | Testing yourself on the cues, then spacing the reviews. |
What the Research Says
In 2014, Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer published a study comparing laptop and longhand note taking The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard. Students who typed tended to transcribe lectures verbatim. That shallow processing hurt performance on conceptual questions. Students who wrote by hand took fewer words but processed meaning, and they did better on tests of understanding.
A later replication found the gap is not always so clean Morehead et al. (2019). The reliable lesson is that the goal is to reframe, not record. If you type, fight the urge to copy. If you write, keep it brief and in your own words. The method matters less than what you do with the notes afterward.
Choose a Structure
A structure keeps your page scannable later. Three common ones work for most classes.
Cornell method
Split the page into a narrow left column, a wide right column, and a bottom strip. The right column holds notes during class. The left column gets cues and questions afterward. The bottom holds a one line summary. This format builds review directly into the page.
Outline method
Use indent levels for main points and sub points. It suits lectures with clear hierarchy, like history timelines or biology classifications.
Concept style
Draw a loose map of ideas and links. This fits topics with many relationships, and it pairs well with a concept maps guide for visual subjects.
During the Lecture
Capture meaning, not transcripts.
Listen for structure
Teachers signal important points with phrasing like "the three causes are" or "remember this." Those are your main entries. Write the signal, not just the fact.
Write in your words
Paraphrase as you go. If you cannot, write the term and revisit it the same day. Leaving a blank with a flag is better than a perfect sentence that made you miss the next idea.
Leave space
Gaps let you add examples after class. A full page with no room is hard to fix later. A margin note such as "ask about this" keeps the question visible.
After the Lecture
The lecture is half the job. The review is the other half.
Step 1: Fill cues within a day
Add questions in the left column. "What are the three causes?" is a retrieval prompt for later.
Step 2: Summarize in one line
The bottom strip forces you to state the point. If you cannot, the lecture did not land yet.
Step 3: Plan the review
Move the notes into a spaced schedule. Test yourself on the cue column two days and one week later. A broad review of study techniques found practice testing and spaced practice among the most useful methods, and rereading among the weakest Dunlosky et al. (2013).
Example: A History Lecture
The teacher covers the causes of a war.
- During class: right column gets "trade limits, alliance web, rising nationalism" in your words.
- After class: left column asks "why did alliances matter?"
- Summary line: "Short term spark met three long term pressures."
- Review: quiz yourself on the left column cues two days and one week later.
How to Review With a Partner
Explaining a page to a friend exposes the spots you only thought you understood. Take turns: one person covers the right column and answers the other person's cue questions. The listener catches vague answers that you would have let slide alone. This is a low cost way to add retrieval practice without any special tool.
Common Misconceptions
- Verbatim typing is note taking. You end with a script and little understanding. The 2014 study showed typists wrote more and understood less on conceptual tests.
- Decorating replaces thinking. Pretty notes that paraphrase nothing waste time. A clean cue column beats colored margins.
- Never reviewing is fine. Notes unused within a day lose most of their value. The review is where memory forms.
- Saving everything is safer. Capture the load bearing points, not the whole talk. You cannot review a wall of text well.
- One review is enough. Retrieval helps because it repeats and spaces. A single pass fades.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is longhand always better than a laptop?
The 2014 study favored longhand for concepts. If you type, summarize in your own words to get a similar benefit, and close every other window so you do not transcribe.
What is the Cornell method?
It splits the page into notes, cues, and a summary so review happens by answering your own prompts.
How soon should I review?
Same day is ideal. Within forty eight hours keeps most of the gain before forgetting sets in.
Can I photograph the board instead?
Photos help as a backup, but writing forces processing. Use photos to fill gaps, not replace notes.
How do I review with a partner?
Cover the notes and take turns answering each other's cue questions. The listener catches vague answers you would miss alone.
Should notes be typed for search?
Search helps organization, yet understanding matters more. Pick the method that keeps you processing meaning.
Sources
- Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard.
- Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2019). A Replication and Extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014).
- Dunlosky, J., et al. (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques.
About the author
Michael R. is a study skills coach with 12 years of experience and a learning specialist. He helps students develop effective study strategies and organizational systems.